I've solved this problem using sqrt decomposition. but how can i solve it using segment tree?
Thanks in advance :)
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
I've solved this problem using sqrt decomposition. but how can i solve it using segment tree?
Thanks in advance :)
| Name |
|---|



You can solve this problem without sqrt decomposition and segment tree. See this 11088217 submission
[DELETED]
That solution uses the idea that since we're asking for all numbers x that have at least x occurences, and the maximum number of elements is 105, the maximum amount of such numbers is 446, because
.
While it's not Mo's algorithm or dividing the queries into
buckets, it's still based on the concept of square root.