Hi —
Recently I took look at problem from Hackerrank BACK TO SCHOOL CODESPRINT called Xor Subsequence. I'm wondering if there is solution to this problem that doesn't utilize FFT.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 164 |
1 | maomao90 | 164 |
3 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
5 | adamant | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
8 | nor | 154 |
10 | djm03178 | 153 |
Hi —
Recently I took look at problem from Hackerrank BACK TO SCHOOL CODESPRINT called Xor Subsequence. I'm wondering if there is solution to this problem that doesn't utilize FFT.
Name |
---|
Frankly saying I don't know an answer to your question, but I will leave this as a fun fact that if we will allow also empty subsequences of form [i, i) (so in fact we increase number of occurences of zero by n) then answer will be always 0 :). It follows from an inequality which shows up in comparing number of occurences of zeros and some other value. Without adding those empty intervals that inequlity changes to , which in fact is not true :(. Or maybe I should say ":)", because that means that this problem has any sense :D.