I have been trying to solve a problem on segmented sieve i.e prime1(http://www.spoj.com/problems/PRIME1/) in spoj but i am getting wrong answer and unable to find the bug in the code. So please help me..
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
I have been trying to solve a problem on segmented sieve i.e prime1(http://www.spoj.com/problems/PRIME1/) in spoj but i am getting wrong answer and unable to find the bug in the code. So please help me..
| Name |
|---|



Sieve Of Eratosthenes will give TLE. It works only for numbers <= 10^6, maybe <= 10^7 with complexity O(n*ln(ln(n))). While checking if number is prime works with numbers <= 10^12 with complexity O(sqrt(n)).
If there are 10 test cases, with worst case of n — m = 100000
worst complexity will be 100000 * 10 * sqrt(1000000000). it would surely tle
reply to sbakic
This will give TLE too. You're doing 105 * log109 operations, which is over 3000M operations.
The correct solution is to generate a list of prime numbers
beforehand, and then mark non-prime numbers in the range [A, B] (if a number is not prime, then there is a prime less or equal than its square root that divides it).
Here's the code: C++ Code with comments
UPDATE: Your solution was OK, albeit slower because it uses map instead of unordered_map. You only needed to consider that l is not prime if l divides p and l > p. Your program didn't consider this last condition and didn't print 2 when l = 2.
I think this problem should be solved using segmented sieve algorithm. :)