→ Pay attention
→ Streams
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3856 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3747 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
| 4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
| 6 | gamegame | 3477 |
| 7 | Benq | 3468 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
| 10 | heuristica | 3431 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
| 3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 158 |
| 5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
| 6 | Qingyu | 153 |
| 7 | djm03178 | 152 |
| 7 | adamant | 152 |
| 9 | luogu_official | 150 |
| 10 | awoo | 147 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2025 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Feb/21/2025 20:52:37 (l1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
In 23-rd line you multiply ints up to 106. It will cause overflow. And be careful about number of digits in output.
I corrected the overflow situation but again I am getting segmentation fault. Could you please check it again? My new solution is here
You are running out of memory. Use vector instead of array with size 50k in line #99. Btw. it is not implemented optimally (complexity is with log^2 I think). I suggest you check out this algorithm with set. It is much simpler.
For example consider test where all points have the same x-coordinate. Then your program is
. It can be fixed but it's nothing fun.
I fixed the size of that array to n everytime. Got accepted now. Thanks bro.
simpler way to find closest pair: link
Similar solution with O(N log N) time https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/closest-pair-of-points-onlogn-implementation/