Author's solution: O(N^4)
GPT's solution: O(N)
:skull:
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Author's solution: O(N^4)
GPT's solution: O(N)
:skull:
| Name |
|---|



This $$$O(n^4) \rightarrow O(n)$$$ reduction looks genius, GPT just says:
Ok. I have better solution! It's $$$O(1)$$$. We have $$$n \leq 50, k \leq 3000$$$ so it's $$$O(1)$$$.
tbank can I have 50000 rubles for a P1S 3d printer
Yes you can!
Are the $$$O(n^3) \to O(n^\omega)$$$ reductions literally just the problem allowing simulating matrix multiplication?
I’m willing to bet many of the other ones also hinge on algorithms that are either too obscure or long to put in a competitive programming contest or just straight garbage like tbank pointed out