I have a question for you: how long do you usually try to solve a problem before looking at the solution? I’d really appreciate it if you could share your experience with me.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Name |
|---|



I read the editorial if I don't have any new ideas for more than 20-30 minutes.
I usually read the editorial after a few failed attempts once I realize my idea was completely wrong. that usually happens after about 3 or 4 days. and I write the idea from the editorial 7–10 days later.
I almost never use editorials. The only few times I have used editorials is that I have spent at least 2 hours on the problem on two different days that I attempt on this problem (which has probably happened less than 10 times in the past year).