Human Trying To Sound Like AI VS AI Trying To Sound Human.

There has been an influx of obviously AI generated blog posts about this and that, and most people on this website are easily able to identify them. However, would they still be able to tell if the human was trying to sound like an AI? If not, this means that humans can essentially "ragebait" Codeforces users, writing articles that they know will be falsely accused of being AI generated. That's what I wanted to find out. First, I wrote an article about why I believe Java is a cool language. Then, I prompted ChatGPT- "Please write an article about why Java is a super cool language. Please make it 3 paragraphs, without headings, bolding, italics, or a title, and between 180-220 words. Please try to sound as human as possible." (Keep in mind I did this prompt AFTER writing my own essay). These two articles are shown in an arbitrary order. See if you can guess which one is AI, and which one was written by me.

START:

There are few languages that have been as impactful to the development of computer science, society, and programming as a whole as Java. It remains one of the most widely used programming languages to this day. Whether you are new to programming, or an expert in the field, its very likely you have used Java at one point or another.

So what makes Java so cool? Java is a language that is designed to be easily learned and endlessly applicable. Java understands that programmers make mistakes, and utilizes several tools to bring these mistakes to light. Type mismatch, index out of bounds, and memory overflow are no issues when you choose to code in Java. The point: Java is an excellent language for education and the advancement of programming abilities.

Java may be easy to learn, but don't dismiss its speed. Capable of running MILLIONS of operations in a single second, Java is used throughout the world to create computer games, web applications, and even mobile apps! Whether you want to code a basic project for school, or make games for the world to see, Java is ready for you. Through both its speed and ease of use, Java is an indisputably cool language.

END

START:

Java is a super cool language because it manages to be both powerful and approachable. Its syntax is relatively straightforward, especially once you get used to concepts like classes and objects, and there is an enormous amount of documentation and community support available. One of Java’s biggest strengths is that it can run on practically any platform through the Java Virtual Machine. Write the code once, compile it, and you can usually run it almost anywhere without completely rewriting everything.

Another thing that makes Java awesome is how versatile it is. You can use it to make desktop applications, websites, Android apps, servers, and all kinds of other software. It also has an enormous standard library, meaning you often do not have to reinvent the wheel just to accomplish something basic. Features like ArrayList, HashMap, and BigInteger can make complicated programming tasks dramatically easier, especially when you are working on algorithms or competitive programming problems.

Finally, Java has simply been around long enough to become incredibly mature. There are countless libraries, tutorials, tools, and programmers who know how to use it. It may not always be the newest or flashiest language, but that reliability is part of what makes it cool. Java is dependable, flexible, and surprisingly fun once you get comfortable with it.

END

Leave your guesses if you want, or if you just hate this concept downvote and tell me why its terrible and I'm helping AI take over codeforces and draining the power supply and clean drinking water supply and gonna make you all die in 20 years. I don't prompt AI for essays very much, so this could be extremely obvious. (I don't think I did a very good job lmao.) I'll share the answer on Saturday, after I go have my MaiMai Fridays day tomorrow.

first one is $$$AI$$$

second one is $$$AI$$$

Edit: As most of y'all (around 75% or so) correctly identified, the AI version was Essay 2. The reason it mentions competitive programming is likely because I have talked to chatgpt about competitive programming before for brainstorming topics or predicting rating changes after the contest but before the tutorial is released. (I probably should have mentioned that I did it on my account. Sorry about that.) In general, I think the "try to talk like a human part" was a big indicator. Essay 2 seems like what an imposter of me would write for why Java is cool, where the reasoning is similar but the formatting and wording is obviously off. It also keeps the basic claim reasoning summary format taught in schools, while my essay seems more general, less risky, and not at all attempting to really sound human. Its the difference between bad human imitation vs bad ai imitation.

Please write an article about why Java is a super cool language. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Java is a super cool language because it manages to be both powerful and approachable. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Комментарии (25)

Написать комментарий?

livenlife453

5 недель назад, скрыть # |

Auto comment: topic has been updated by livenlife453 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Ответить

so I suck at formatting, so that's why there are 4 revisions lol

M.Bemanali

5 недель назад, скрыть # ^ |

In the blogs page you can disable a check for it to not put auto comments for edits.

Ghammaz-Hassan

First one is written by you and second one is GPT.

Abdur-Rehman

← Rev. 2 →

"Java is a super cool language..." 🥀🥀

123gjweq2

People are downvoting, but this is actually a pretty cool blog.

I would say the second one is written by you, since I don't think chatgpt would mention competitive programming if it weren't in the prompt. Either way, both seem $$$AI$$$-ish, so good job.

I do think that the first one feels like it has the cadence of an $$$AI$$$ more than the second one, but it's not that much of a difference. Both paragraphs have the $$$X$$$, $$$Y$$$, $$$Z$$$ pattern $$$AI$$$ seems to be so obsessed with.

Also, you could make the blog more engaging by adding a vote section at the end, like

I would have done that if I knew that was possible lol. Unfortunately I'm still a noob when it comes to this stuff.

CodeX_ID2010

Hope this helps

Thanks for telling me how

HAMID.GEMINI

if you dont have maimai , will you still share ?

lattermatter

Should have used a bunch of em dashes to trick us

RHEXAOC

The second one is better. I only read them once, so I'm just going with my intuition, not analysis. You asked ChatGPT to make it "super cool," and the second essay uses those exact words. But I liked the first essay as well; it sounded more human. Since I read both only once, I could be making a mistake, so please excuse that. The first one used rare words, and it felt like they were there to sound more pleasant or knowledgeable. That feels more human. First — human, second — AI. However, I don't understand why the second article mentions competitive programming, though that might be a memory from its previous conversations.

bill_s

My guess: the second one (Java is super cool because it's both powerful and approachable...) is the AI-written one, and the first one is yours.

A few tells in the second passage:

The structure is very "five paragraph essay" — topic sentence, elaboration, transition word ("Another thing," "Finally"), wrap-up. Very GPT. Phrases like "powerful and approachable," "dependable, flexible, and surprisingly fun" — that rule-of-three adjective stacking at the end of a paragraph is a classic ChatGPT tic. It's suspiciously well-balanced — one paragraph per "pillar" (portability, versatility, maturity), no tangents, no personality quirks.

The first one has a few things that read more human to me:

"MILLIONS" in caps for emphasis — feels like an actual person's inflection, not something GPT tends to do unprompted. "The point: Java is an excellent language..." — that kind of blunt, slightly informal aside is very much a human writing pattern, not typical LLM phrasing. The praise of exception handling ("Type mismatch, index out of bounds, and memory overflow are no issues...") is a mildly questionable claim (Java still throws exceptions/OOMEs at runtime, it just handles them more gracefully than C) — feels like an enthusiastic-but-not-perfectly-precise human take, whereas an AI response would probably hedge more carefully or phrase it more like "helps catch these earlier."

So: first = human, second = AI. Curious to see if I'm right on Saturday.

You, my grey friend, miss the point, and I am here to guide you to a bright future. The AI was asked to sound "as human as possible." So, if it were a smart AI, it would do exactly as your analysis suggests: 'MILLIONS in caps for emphasis...' The question remains: Was the AI too stupid to imitate a human while being too smart in knowing what Java is? I don't know Java, e.g., I only know binary search.

You, my green friend, dismiss my joke, and I am here to thus guide you to a greater and smarter mind. I was merely using ironic effect by pretending like my writing is AI like, so that it was as if an AI was judging an AI, and you do not seem to understand that. You argue with me, as if I was serious in any way. This blog post's question is a difficult decision, you know? I wouldn't spit out a response within the fraction of a second, would I? I would just wait. But you foolishly assume the opposite. But alas, I am not to be fooled by conclusions and questions like these. You see, I have the rare ability of humor recognition. And that gift also comes with humor creation. And I will make sure to spread the word my creating more fun. But, it appears you have none of these qualities. You'd be the newbie on a platform for jokers, while I would reign high above even the title of 4000. So please, put aside your ratist ego, and maybe learn how to implement sense of humor into your brain.

Humor is not my cup of tea, for various reasons, though. Times like these remind me that my preferences are rare. To be complete, I wasn't expecting "grey friend" to be a trigger, except for a LIGHT irony. My emphasis was on a logical statement: the contradiction that AI can do complicated language tasks but not simple ones, like imitating human text. My response was meant to trigger a dialogue in this direction. And not comparing the. I hope that's fine. No need to respond.