Congratulations ChatGPT for obtaining a total score of $$$602$$$ out of $$$600$$$ in SEATST! Here is its distribution:
Day 1: $$$100 + 100 + 100 = 300$$$
Day 2: $$$102 + 100 + 100 = 302$$$
Explanation
ChatGPT managed to solve Problem 2A: Triple Circuit using just $$$213$$$ logic gates (you needed to use $$$\leq 215$$$ logic gates to obtain full score). If we use the scoring function $$$f(K) = 1 - 0.40 \times \frac{K - 215}{41}$$$ (since no one expected $$$K \lt 215$$$ to be within the domain of $$$f$$$), this gives $$$f(213) = 1.0195$$$, which is a score of $$$102$$$ (TLX rounds scores to the nearest integer).
ChatGPT's solution








Auto comment: topic has been updated by literalchild (previous revision, new revision, compare).
ChatGPT broke the system
How did it find it? Did this need pro or was 5.5 enough? Details would be interesting.
I used the latest model (5.5) on Thinking Mode on a Plus account.
My first prompt just asked it to solve the problem. It came up with the idea of
arranging the bits in a grid.
My next prompt asked it to solve in $$$\leq 256$$$ gates. It came up with the idea of
Arranging the bits in $$$64$$$ pairs, so at least two pairs have OR equal to $$$1$$$ if there is an anomaly.
My third prompt asked it to solve using around $$$215$$$ gates. Despite the fact that the previous two ideas, when combined, gave a full solution, ChatGPT was unable to find it in $$$7$$$ minutes. I had to prompt it to explicitly merge the two ideas before it saw the full solution.
Some time later, I asked ChatGPT to solve the problem in $$$\leq 214$$$ gates (on the same chat instance), and it came up with the construction for $$$213$$$ gates.
Amazing. I wonder how much better it can do. My friends tell me that 5.4/5.5 Pro is already solving their open research problems. Did you use the web interface or codex?
I just used the web interface.
I think (not entirely sure) at the moment for these sort of individual problems where you wouldn’t need to cross codebases and files, pro on web interface is better than codex.
I think that the solution proposed by ChatGPT can be further optimized by not calculating the value P[n] (OR of the whole part), as we don't actually use it later. Thus we can lower the number of gates needed to just 210, because we use one gate less for each of the 3 parts.
It is possible for all three parts to each have exactly one active node.
Thus we need to calculate the OR of the whole part to check this condition.
Nevermind, I am stupid