Might wanna update your computer if you run linux. (and probably also codeforces servers)
Also maybe I don't fully understand the kernel and am complaining too much but still who decided it was a good idea to let page cache be overwritten
→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Sep/23/2026 16:43:11 (g2).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
Auto comment: topic has been updated by greateric (previous revision, new revision, compare).
dang if I'm not mistaken an $$$AI$$$ model heavily assisted in finding this bug right?
Codebase scanning I believe, yeah, it seems pretty insane how skilled it was
It's pretty crazy isn't it? One of anthropic's models also found a really old bug in openbsd apparently, so it could be that systems are either going to be very secure or very insecure in the near future. But I wonder if any of these bugs have already been discovered by the $$$CIA$$$ / $$$NSA$$$ (like eternalblue) or if some of them were put there intentionally. Like this privesc didn't exist before $$$2017$$$, why is that?
Yeah. Personally I feel like there should be more focus on safety in things like Linux, especially given how many exploits rely on memory issues. Like lots of fortify everything, put canaries everywhere and check if they get overwritten lol
They use Windows. Yeah, it's not great, but anyways.