ashwini492222's blog

By ashwini492222, history, 5 months ago, In English

I would like to address the similarity noticed in my solution.

Think of the array as a sequence of numbers from 1 to n, and you are interested in picking a continuous segment (subarray). For any chosen segment, you compute the XOR of all its elements.

Now, instead of directly checking every segment, notice this:

The XOR of a segment from l to r can be represented using prefix XOR values. So the problem essentially becomes: how many pairs of positions define a segment whose XOR evaluates to 0?

Another way to see it:

Imagine building an array where each position stores the XOR of all elements from the start up to that index. If two positions have the same prefix XOR value, then the segment between them has XOR = 0. So instead of focusing on segments, you’re really counting pairs of indices with equal prefix XOR values.

Now add the twist:

The sequence [1..n] has a very structured behavior — its prefix XOR doesn’t change randomly, it follows a repeating cycle depending on the index modulo 4. Because of this, you don’t have many distinct XOR values to deal with—just a few repeating patterns.

So the problem shifts from:

“Check all subarrays”

to:

“Group indices based on their prefix XOR pattern and count how many valid pairs can be formed.”

And if there’s a special index x involved:

You split the array into two parts (before x and after x), Count how many indices in each part fall into each XOR group, Then combine those counts to get the final answer.

This approach is a natural consequence of the mathematical properties of the sequence and matches the general idea described in the editorial. As a result, independently derived solutions are likely to look very similar in logic and structure.

I wrote my code independently during the contest without consulting any external material.

Hence, any resemblance is due to the inherent nature of the problem rather than any form of collaboration.

Submission: https://codeforces.me/contest/2225/submission/372032850

I kindly request the Codeforces team to recheck my submission and review all my submissions in this contest. If possible, please reconsider the skipped/flagged status after verification.

I fully respect the platform’s rules and would appreciate a fair review.

  • Vote: I like it
  • -16
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by ashwini492222 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by ashwini492222 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Ah yes. I didnt cheat because i can copy the editorial to proof my innocence

  • »
    »
    5 months ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    so you write code of segment trees from scratch every time you encounter a data structure problem or you have a template pre written????

    • »
      »
      »
      5 months ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Wtf does this has to do with segment tree? Also, yes i do write my own segment tree every time. What point are you trying to make here?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 months ago, hide # ^ |
         
        Vote: I like it -6 Vote: I do not like it

        i mean cant we use prewritten templates and knowledge of papers in contest.there are fully fleged sourses like usaco guide.i have also build up my templates and use code from there as my necessity.it is plag>>and what do you mean by your first commment.

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

honestly for problems with such short code it's much more likely to hit a false positive.

follow up questions:

what submission(s) did the system message say your code matches?

and did you get skipped because of plag check on D specifically or on another problem, both options cause you to get a skipped verdict

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

yes he is genuine i have seen his whole profile and he has never cheated in any contest cf kindly recalculate his round . i assure he is a valid user also i know him personaly

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why the hell are people downvoting the post? He understands the thought process and thats all he can do to prove his innocence. Its really unlikely someone gets the solutions before the contest FROM the editorial. And the problem being formula based makes it impossible to detect cheaters (Without obvious ai flags)

  • »
    »
    5 months ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    thats the reason of problem being formulae based makes it a stupid problem.cf is popular for its problems being completely new.why the hell are educational contests mostly repeated problems.cf look into it.