| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



I'm not sure if that's the actual issue but I'm pretty sure __gcd isn't O(1) and it's actually logarithmic which means inside of that triple loop you're calling __gcd millions of times.
I'd say you just need to optimize this but I'm not 100% sure.
Also using vector<vector> dp(n, vector(l, -1e18)) inside of while (t--) might be memory risky
the problem is the gcd probably,__gcd and gcd uses different algorithms, I dont know what algortihm __gcd uses but gcd use Euclidean algorithm which is faster