Personally that F1 looks pretty conclusive of an evidence, we'll see what we can do about it.

Auto comment: topic has been updated by maanassehgal (previous revision, new revision, compare).

Crazy longago_06, mst cheating krte ho tum bhai

Same issue with LiFar.
Check out the blog here : https://codeforces.me/blog/entry/151524

Everyone knows that this is a bait by you Maanas to defame me,you hated me from the very beginning ,right ? Let me explain just to you and answer all the wrong propaganda you are trying to spread :

1) You cannot prove that my solution is a reference of some other solution

2) I cannot claim that I am great at problem solving , there are problems where even I stuck sometimes , the rating map does not prove anything other than your rage , I believe in solving better quality of problems and just pick a few at a sitting to solve .

3) Everybody knows I am from India , I changed to japan because I admire maspy and jiangly fan club because I am a fan of jiangly , this is quite obvious from my coding style , but people like you just dox the shit out of everyone for absolutely no reason

4) That post is also from a hater like you .

Auto comment: topic has been updated by maanassehgal (previous revision, new revision, compare).

Third time getting called out for cheating and bro’s still out here like it’s a side quest he refuses to abandon. xD

this guy thinks i was being racist or smth ig

"He submitted today's F1 in Div1, if you submit that same solution to F2, it will get an AC, but he didn't submit it to avoid getting an even higher rank. Here's the solution link for your reference"

I believe that's not enough of an evidence, in the previous rated div2 I gave, I solved E1 using the observations required for E2 although 32*(n+m) queries were required for passing that, my solution was only taking (n+m+1), and I just needed to deal with 1 stupid mistake and it could've got AC for E2 as well. Although I know none of you, so I have no judgement over this.

https://codeforces.me/contest/2201/submission/364101840 and is it not the same what I did ,at the same submission time in F1 , I am saying this just to make a claim !

crazy that jiangly loses 10 for finishing fourth

Only 5-6 contest from CM->M ...was it a grind or cheating.Pls don't do it ..We want a good cp culture in india and these guys do this shit every week.

Bro, I personally met him during the ICPC Amritapuri Regionals, and this so called master could only solve the first three easiest problems. He couldn't even solve the fourth. Meanwhile, many teams with members who are only at the Expert or Specialist level were able to solve the fourth and fifth problems. He was clearly exposed there, yet he hasn't stopped cheating. He also blocked me on LinkedIn because I challenged him to a Google Meet, I have solid proof of his cheating. In a LeetCode contest, he solved a digit-DP problem without realizing it was digit DP, and his tabulation solution exactly matched my friend's submission, which was also generated using AI. Cheating is dangerous the day he realizes his actual level, he may fall into deep depression if he doesn't stop soon.

Can anyone tell me which extension is this or it is some setting in codeforces?

not only him but i can literally put a list here , people like sundaramtiwari9696 , rajesh_20, guptaakshita1502 this girl even got RTE on problem A and then went on to solve C1 in 4 mins damn , ayushsouthpoint, Saurabh071107, shri_raj, shubhsrivastava071972 and many more were cheating in yesterday's contest, i hope chromate00 looks into it for once and removes these idiots

Hey maanassehgal,

Please add this to the list of proofs.

355388782 of a disabled account / known cheater.

355399645 of Mr. Ayush Ranjan from KIIT

its literally same except the corny variables like "sex/fuck" which he uses to obfuscate his code.

This should be on top of recents actions..

Offtopic, but where can I get the graphs you've shown in the first screenshot to use for myself?

Please check this account too:

VSS402002_Muhammad_Adil

I strongly agree with this post.. request chromate00 and to look into this matter..this kind of activity is not acceptable...please ban him with conclusive evidence...manas you should mention the link of round which he is cheated..

vell vell vell Ban all the poop pajeet from this platform. they belong to poop land

The Three rules written in F1 submission are copied from Teja-Smart

.

.

Hello [user:MikeMirzayanov][user:Vladosiya] Please ban this Cheater Profile: NeelmaniPandey09

Past few months, he has shown highly suspicious contest behavior and he used a new kind of technique to skip plagiarism detection.

Suspicious Rating Progression The user historically solved mostly 1200–1400 rated problems, yet within a short period they suddenly reached Candidate Master. Proof : https://ibb.co/BKVBzt2K Their practice activity and contest performance do not align:

Practice solves mostly low-mid rated problems. Proof : https://innocent-orange-sdqeznilzx.edgeone.app/

In contest he easily solves upto D within less than 20 mins of the time for each problem This mismatch appears repeatedly across multiple contests. This strongly suggests that the solutions used during contests are not written by him.

Suspicious Coding Style Used During Contests

Many of the contest submissions follow an unusual pattern that appears designed to avoid plagiarism detection.

Example submission:

364353196 359406088 358337498 358317398 and almost every contest submission is similar

Fact check: 1. Artificially Over-Engineered Code

The code is split into many unnecessarily long functions such as: computeNextOpen computeSuffixData computeBalances calculateMaxLen evaluateSplit

For cp, especially within the first 15 minutes of a contest, it is extremely uncommon to structure solutions with so many helper functions unless they are pre-written templates. These functions appear problem-specific, meaning they were likely generated or copied rather than written naturally during the contest.

2.** Excessive Use of do-while Loops** Nearly every loop in the code is written using do-while:

do {
    s.add(sStr.charAt(l));
} while (++l < n);
do {
    nextOpen.set(k, lastOpen);
    lastOpen = (s.get(k) == '(') ? k : lastOpen;
} while (--k >= 0);

It is rare to see do whiles in contest but he uses this for everything is extremely unusual in competitive programming. Most contestants use simple for loops. This appears to be an intentional attempt to obfuscate copied code. 3. Unnecessary Data Structures Example: HashMap<String, ArrayList> suffixData Used only to store two arrays: "open" "close" private void addToSegment(int id, int val) { segments.get(id).add(val); }

Any normal contest implementation would simply use two arrays:

int[] sufOpen int[] sufClose

Introducing a HashMap with string keys in a contest solution is inefficient and unnecessary, and strongly suggests code manipulation designed to change structure while preserving logic. 4. Overly Long Variable / Function Names Examples: calculateMaxLen computeSuffixData evaluateSplit checkIndex

who uses a super long function public static bluh bluh with very long data type and very long function name just to get value out of hashmap

1. Unrealistic Typing Time These complex multi-function solutions were submitted within ~15 minutes of contest start. Given: multiple custom functions layered logic verbose naming unusual loop constructs

It is unlikely that such code was written from zero during the contest. Pattern Across Multiple Contests This is not a single suspicious submission. Across multiple contests: the same obfuscation style appears the same heavy function splitting the same do-while based loop style

Yet outside contests, the user's submissions appear much simpler and natural, which further increases suspicion.

I request to ban him NeelmaniPandey09

he's back. get him boys