Блог пользователя DmitriyH

Автор DmitriyH, 10 лет назад, По-английски

Codeforces Round 270 round statistics :

First accepted:

A (00:01) 135678942570 AkshajK KADR Lord.of.AMC Te4NIK Wild_Hamster ainu7 andrewzta arknave athin flashmt jonathanirvings minimario speedermen ngochai94 Sert stevenkplus const_int_magic
B (00:03) tourist
C (00:06) snuke wo_
D (00:16) aitzhan.askar
E (01:31) Petr
F (00:50) PavelKunyavskiy
G (01:08) riadwaw

Total hack attempts: +81:-214

Top-11 hackers:

400 zetamoo +4:-0
400 xiaohao1238 +4:-0
300 Lelby +3:-0
300 dirbaio +3:-0
200 ichyo +2:-0
200 Schullz +2:-0
200 swap +2:-0
200 Nikitosh +2:-0
200 sublinekelzrip +2:-0
200 espr1t +2:-0
200 VArtem +2:-0

Other info


Complete Results 1-1600
Complete Results 1601-3200
Complete Results 3201-N






FAQ

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +43
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
10 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +79 Проголосовать: не нравится

601 place with 1333 gets +375, but worse with -89 and 469 place gets only +319... Hm..

»
10 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +28 Проголосовать: не нравится

worse had 469th place (higher than some top breakthroughs), he definitely had lower rating than them, but he got less rating points. It seems quite a strange.

DmitriyH, didn't you have an idea to find pairs of participants A, B that startRatingA < startRatingB, placeA < placeB and deltaA < deltaB?. Is it common situation?

  • »
    »
    10 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

    One possible explanation could be that worse's rating is more or less determined to be at that range (let's say 0 +/- 350) while for the other people the margin of error in their determined ratings could be higher (let's say 1333 +/- 450).

    It would be interesting to also include matchesA < matchesB (possibly implying a larger margin of error in determining their ratings).

    • »
      »
      »
      10 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Yeah, it could be right, but page about rating doesn't mention anything like that (any input except old ratings and places) :(

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        10 лет назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Yes, on CF the rating is primarily based on Elo, which does not take that into account unlike on sites like Topcoder, where we can see volatility.

»
10 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

Isn't this a higher breakthrough?

»
10 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -11 Проголосовать: не нравится

you and illi are so annoying! and you're first by contribution only because of your useless stats

»
10 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Different results in best hackers between you and illi why is that?