Would using LLMs to generate new test cases for a question be considered cheating? Can someone please ask mike about this?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 142 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
Would using LLMs to generate new test cases for a question be considered cheating? Can someone please ask mike about this?
| Name |
|---|



Why some people can't use codeforces as before...
U can generate testcase using normal software.And many top rated coders do that I guess.It is clearly legal until unless u use AI to tamper your code.
So its not cheating?
I don't think generating test cases can be considered cheating. U dont even need AI to do that.There are softwares that generate random numbers of various range and those are available in google.
I do think it's cheating. Debugging and writing stress tests is part of solving a problem, and writing a generator that generates random numbers in a specific format is part of that. Unless the input is only a single number, google rng will not be of much use.
Try to do tasks completely without AI. That way, you'll actually learn something from them!
.