why does a 1500 rated question from div1 + div2 feels way harder than a 1500 rated question from div2?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
why does a 1500 rated question from div1 + div2 feels way harder than a 1500 rated question from div2?
| Name |
|---|



It's not like human can set same level of difficulty problems in every contest. You found some 1500 rated problem from div1 + div2 feels harder then a 1500 rated question from div2. I also found vice verse.
In my experience, the length of the contest affects the calibration of the problem rating (at least in terms of implementation difficulty). I think it's because in a longer contest more people will have time to solve it so the user rating of the average solver will be lower
I believe that a rating of x on a problem means that half of the people around that rating will be able to solve that problem. Since Div 1 + Div 2 usually have higher rated participants in general, a 1500 rated problem might be harder in general than a Div 2 1500 rated problem.
This would make sense if Div1 + Div2 had higher rated participants around 1500 rating, but why would that be the case?
True. And it's much harder to get the same performance at Div.1 than at Div.2.