SashaT9's blog

By SashaT9, 5 weeks ago, In English

Recently, while working on some combinatorics, I stumbled upon an interesting identity. I haven't seen it mentioned before, so I decided to share it here (with the hope that someone will find it fascinating).

The identity

$$$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^k\binom{n}{k}(2^{n-k}-1)^m=\sum_{k=0}^{m}(-1)^k\binom{m}{k}(2^{m-k}-1)^n$$$

holds for $$$n, m \geq 1$$$.

We may apply it for specific $$$(n,m)$$$ and get interesting results. For example, $$$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^k\binom{n}{k}(2^{n-k}-1)=1$$$ holds because we use the original identity for $$$m=1$$$.

I encourage everyone to try to prove it by themselves before reading my proof.

Proof
Corollaries

If you have other proofs of this identity, I would gladly read about them in the comments.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +54
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +17 Vote: I do not like it

are we actually gonne get this in your next div 3 ...

  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I'm gonna put this as the last problem

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

didn't you just switch out $$$n$$$ with $$$m$$$?

  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    yes, but it isn't obvious (at least for me) that switching them out do not change the value of that sum.

    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it -15 Vote: I do not like it

      I am probably not getting something here, but isn't that kinda the same thing as using $$$j$$$ in a for loop instead of $$$i$$$?

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Nice. It is discussed here.

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

The specific result is just the binomial expansion of (2-1)^n + (1-1)^n = 1.

My proof for the general identity

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

provide proof for sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k * (n choose k) * (2n — k — 1)^m = sum_{k=0}^m (-1)^k * (m choose k) * (2m — k — 1)^n

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -19 Vote: I do not like it

It's obvious interchanging n and m doesnt matter. easy pz

»
5 weeks ago, # |
Rev. 8   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it