This was my submission 256491105. Can somebody explain to me why this solution gives TLE?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 156 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | nor | 152 |
This was my submission 256491105. Can somebody explain to me why this solution gives TLE?
Название |
---|
You’re making an array of size $$$2e5+1$$$ for every test case and there are like $$$10^4$$$ tests. Instead you should’ve made the array of size $$$n+1$$$, and then proceeded with whatever you’re doing (this will get rid of the TLE)
Thank you!
But if i send it in C++20 it works 256544470
Do you know what could be the difference?
That is really strange. I don’t know why this happens; I’d expect it to TLE as well
the problem could be solved easily by counting number of cards having 2 ouccrences to get max score optimally . and your tle problem is solved by the guy before me
because u use (2e5+1) * (10^4) and this it too large, u can use map<int, int> instead