| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 155 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 10 | djm03178 | 152 |
Hola amigos, I was trying to solve this ternary search problem -> 782B - The Meeting Place Cannot Be Changed and when I am using a for loop till 100 for calculating the answer I am getting accepted -> 250509099
But when I am using r-l<eps, then I am getting TLE -> 250509364 Please help
test for eps = 2e-6
I got your point , it worked for the eps should be less 1e-6 so I tried for 9e-7 and it worked.
But what I'm not getting is will the time complexity be affected so much i use eps = 1e-7 that it gets TLE and time difference becomes from 46ms to TLE??
it's floating point bullshit don't worry about it
Thanks :)