| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



Sum can be 1e14 which would lead to overflow you can set a upperlimit of 1e9
The maximum value that a long long variable can have is $$$2^{63} - 1$$$. In your code
sumcan be equal to $$$2 \cdot 10^{14}$$$ in some test cases and thusmid * midmay get bigger than the long long limit.In worst case, the sum can be 2*10^14 then the mid will be 10^14. mid * mid will be 10^28. long long can hold at most 10^18.
instead of binary search,why arent you using sqrt its much simpler code