...
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



Let, $$$n$$$ = no of nodes, $$$m$$$ = no of edges Finding all pair shortest path using belmenford takes $$$O(n^2m)$$$ but floyed warshal takes $$$O(n^3)$$$ time. floyed is very easy to write and code is short.
Floyd can be optimized to n^3/32
using bitset?
What do you mean by $$$O(V^3)$$$ is mostly more than $$$O(V^2E)$$$?
What if $$$E\gg V$$$?
Yes that why I said mostly and I think that bellman ford takes o((v-1)*v*e)
So then in these cases where $$$E\gg V$$$, the Floyd-Warshall will be much faster, so that's why it's useful
It's useful when E is much bigger than V