If you want a variable to be the negative of itself, do you use n = -n
, n *= -1
, or other methods? If so, suggest some methods down below.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 159 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | djm03178 | 153 |
6 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 149 |
9 | awoo | 148 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
If you want a variable to be the negative of itself, do you use n = -n
, n *= -1
, or other methods? If so, suggest some methods down below.
Name |
---|
Why does it matter too much?
It's a serious debate, as the title of the blog says
n = n*(6968-6969)
lol,
How about
n = ~n
?n = binary_exponentiate(-1,69)*n
n=+-n
is the best