Given a string Str, rearrange Str such that the resultant string T maximizes min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))).
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Given a string Str, rearrange Str such that the resultant string T maximizes min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))).
| Name |
|---|



looks like min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))) cannot exceed longest palindromic subsequence of Str, hence T=Str should work, i may be wrong tho
Actually it can exceed that.
Let $$$str = \text{aabb}$$$, $$$T = \text{abba}$$$. Now, $$$\min(\mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{abba}), \mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{abba})) = \min(3, 3) = 3$$$.
If you choose $$$T = str$$$, you get $$$\min(\mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{aabb}), \mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{bbaa})) = \min(4, 2) = 2$$$.
yeah, i knew most probably my claim must be wrong
anyways, please tell how to solve the above problem