Codeforces Round 1133 (Div. 1, Div. 2) is coming soon! Register here. ×

The_dreamer_'s blog

Check if there exists a simple cycle have total weight >= 0
By The_dreamer_, history, 3 years ago, In English

Please help me with this problem: Given an undirected weighted graph have n vertices and m edges (n <= 1000, m <= 10000). How to check if there exists a simple cycle have total weight >= 0. Thanks for your help.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +21
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

You can multiply each edge weight by $$$-1$$$. Then use Bellman Ford's algorithm to find a negative cycle which iirc works in $$$O(n^2 + n \cdot m)$$$.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it +13 Vote: I do not like it

    But as far as I know, it can only be used for directed graph. When use it in undirected graph, this algorithm can go on a loop in a negative weighted edge (cycle of length 2) but it not simple cycle.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      3 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Not sure. There's another approach you can try. It has an $$$O(m^2)$$$ complexity so not sure if it will pass. For eaxh edge from node $$$a$$$ to node $$$b$$$ with weight $$$w$$$, "remove" that edge, then find the shortest distance between $$$a$$$ and $$$b$$$ (assuming there is indeed a path between these after removing the edge). Let the distance found be $$$p$$$. You have a cycle with weight $$$p+w$$$.

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        3 years ago, hide # ^ |
         
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        But how can we find the shortest distance between a and b ? It still can go on a loop in a negative weighted edge.

        → Reply
»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone help me please. I still can't solve this problem.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Sorry I forgot to reply back. You can use modified Bellman Ford's: keep track of the node used to relax the distance for every node, this way you can avoid 2 node cycles.

    → Reply
»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

problem link??

→ Reply
»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I think you can use Bellman Ford's algorithm but with vertices {vertex, last edge}, and then you update distance only if new edge is not equal to the last edge used. I think it will still be O(m^2) because every edge creates only 2 new vertices.

→ Reply