so i was solving a cses question and i had a confusion...why dont we sort a set or multiset before applying lower bound and upper bound? i saw some solutions and they just simply added the elements and directly applied lower bound and upper bound.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3976 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3482 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3382 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3357 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 161 |
3 | Um_nik | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
so i was solving a cses question and i had a confusion...why dont we sort a set or multiset before applying lower bound and upper bound? i saw some solutions and they just simply added the elements and directly applied lower bound and upper bound.
Название |
---|
It's because they are sorted data structures. You might want to read the references for these containers on Cppreference.
Sorted data structures = Already sorted right? also why do they have a separate lower bound and upper bound function. why not use the std:lowerbound and upperbound?
Oh, so you were asking for why they had their own member function. You can refer to the functions' reference for this, see the reference for std::lower_bound, especially the section labeled Complexity.