I wrote a recursive solution with O(n^3) time complexity imo.
But I am getting TLE Verdict on submission .
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
I wrote a recursive solution with O(n^3) time complexity imo.
But I am getting TLE Verdict on submission .
Samples —
3 1 4 2
4 2 1 3
According to the editorial we are taking pairs of indices which form a valid pair (Qj,Pi). All pairs are = (0,3)(1,0),(1,1)(1,2)(1,3)(2,0)(3,0)(3,1). [zero based indexing] Now we are sorting according to (i,-j).
New order of pairs is = (0,-3)(1,-3),(1,-2)(1,-1)(1,0)(2,0)(3,-1)(3,0). Now taking LIS considering only j's, we have ans as 4 but answer should be 2.
There is no clear explanation in the editorial, no C++ sample solution in the editorial and No english youtube video explaining this approach. I also tried to understand solutions of top rated coders but I think they have used fenwick tree.
Can anyone explain please I am stuck in this question since a day trying to understand this editorial.
Can anyone tell me the dp transitions for this problem ? Even after seeing the editorial I am not able to code.
I am getting runtime error on n=1000, m=1000 test cases. Unable to figure out why.
Sorry for messed up code.
| Name |
|---|


