I finish this code, but the judger says I am out of bounds, can anyone tell me why or is there anyting wrong on other places? Thanks very much.
Begged for help.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
I finish this code, but the judger says I am out of bounds, can anyone tell me why or is there anyting wrong on other places? Thanks very much.
Begged for help.
In the official tutorial, we defined a dp[i][j] array which means that we consider 1~i and has j elements that haven't been deleted, I just want to ask if it is possible to solve it by redefined the dp: consider 1~i and has already use j moves. Could anyone tell me if my idea is possible to solve problem?
| Name |
|---|


