I have built a brute force solution to this problem but of course time limit exceeded monster has appeared!
please can anyone explain a solution or just give a hint for this problem, i have read the editorial but i didn't understand what is written.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | djm03178 | 152 |
I have built a brute force solution to this problem but of course time limit exceeded monster has appeared!
please can anyone explain a solution or just give a hint for this problem, i have read the editorial but i didn't understand what is written.
recently i have been studying graph theory from competitive programming book ,in applications of DFS there was articulation points and bridges . He defines other than visited array a another one here is the statement.
[This algorithm maintains two numbers: dfs_num(u) and dfs_low(u). Here, dfs_num(u) stores the iteration counter when the vertex u is visited for the first time and not just for distinguishing DFS_WHITE versus DFS_GRAY/DFS_BLACK. The other number dfs_low(u) stores the lowest dfs_num reachable from DFS spanning sub tree of u. Initially dfs_low(u) = dfs_num(u) when vertex u is first visited. Then, dfs_low(u) can only be made smaller if there is a cycle (some back edges exist). Note that we do not update dfs_low(u) with back edge (u, v) if v is a direct parent of u. ]
please anyone give an explanation for this part.
Название |
---|