Plag check till Round 1030 is done, still no rollback till now. Why?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
Plag check till Round 1030 is done, still no rollback till now. Why?
For some people, math solutions don't just come naturally by "intuition"; you have to consider this when setting a problem set, this nature varies from country to country.
As we know, Codeforces has a rule regarding third-party code, which states that if you copy code from a public source available before the contest, it is not considered cheating. However, here's the issue: Codeforces first checks for code similarity between submissions. If a significant portion of the code matches across multiple accounts (typically 70% or more), Codeforces automatically flags the other submissions, except for the first one, as plagiarism.
So, what's the point of the third-party code rule?
Here is a blog related to this kind of issue, though cf didn't rejudge his solution.
| Name |
|---|


