→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Comments
|
0
could be cause u are using int for the sum of the whole array instead of long long when it can exceed the int limit maybe, that's something similar that happened to me on my 1st submission |
|
0
what is the idea for E when n%2 !=0 ? |
|
0
relatable |
|
0
probably because of overflow |
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Nov/06/2026 09:39:51 (h1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
