| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
|
0
Mine? |
|
+5
I could infer we have to make xor of first two numbers equal to xor of the rest of the array. How to proceed further? |
|
+3
Yup, this would be much better. |
|
0
See solve2() function in my solution. Basically when adding characters in a new string, I am randomizing my solution,i.e., picking any character at that index from the given list of strings. |
|
+9
What do you mean by O(n), but faster? Do you mean 'with smaller constant factor'? |
|
0
⚡Lightning speed editorial |
|
0
You may see my binary search implemented solution. 79500682 |
|
0
Thanks a lot for the great explanation |
|
0
Can you tell how you reduced the problem to this? |
| Name |
|---|


