| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 154 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 146 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
|
+1
Thanks! I am hoping that repeatedly using Haskell on hard problems will help me learn and internalize category theory. I spend most of my career re-learning the same decision framework in slightly different contexts. If it is possible to abstract decision making to a higher level through math like category theory, then I can focus on making truly novel decisions at work. |
|
0
Auto comment: topic has been updated by flyinggit (previous revision, new revision, compare). |
|
0
Auto comment: topic has been updated by flyinggit (previous revision, new revision, compare). |
| Name |
|---|


