| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
|
+23
|
|
0
I see. I hadn't come across that blog before. Thanks for sharing. |
|
0
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Getaway_Car (previous revision, new revision, compare). |
|
+47
Codeforces is not an appropriate platform for expressing patriotism. And please use English, as using other languages may confuse readers. I genuinely don’t understand why comments like these receive upvotes. |
|
+4
Well, maybe not — given the number of cheaters, the strange Div. 1 problem arrangement, and C1/2 being much harder than they should’ve been. :( |
|
+1
If there are some hints before the solution, it will become better. |
|
0
One of my friends' $$$O(nq)$$$ code also passed. I guess the test data is random. And here is the hack: |
| Name |
|---|


