| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3390 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | tourist | 3384 |
| 8 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 9 | turmax | 3319 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
|
0
I was a Python coder myself. Normally PyPy is faster, but once I submitted a problem in PyPy and it got TLE (the same code was later accepted in Python3). So I had to decide which to use where. Even though a solution is O(n) and optimal does not guarantees an AC in every language. Internally Python is slower than C++ and a more efficient solution in Python may get TLE whereas a less optimal solution may get an AC in C++. Even though there is a time relaxation in the background for some languages, that is not enough to get an AC. Therefore sometimes it is written that_ a solution is not guaranteed in every language_. |
| Name |
|---|


