| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 142 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
|
+57
R.I.P Tet |
|
0
*in CF not CP |
|
+8
"It can be proved that doing dijkstra in the new graph is sufficient if we guarantee that the first used edge is not fake. We can map waiting for x seconds and then using an edge to go to u from v to using a cannon and then using x fake edges to go to u from v." |
|
+148
|
|
+29
Ali_Tavakoli orz |
|
+8
aha :) |
|
+31
no my birth date in shamsi calendar which this year is 1399th year of this calendar |
|
+53
My first rating was my birth date |
|
On
MikeMirzayanov →
Codeforces: Soon We Will Change the Rating Calculation for New Accounts, 6 years ago
+6
orz |
|
0
Did you solve that? What did you do? Binary search + idea or you did Some Other Algorithms |
| Name |
|---|


