| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3390 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | tourist | 3384 |
| 8 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 9 | turmax | 3319 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | AmShZ | 138 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Название |
|---|



It's a stack-overflow error.
And because of the fact that
sizeof(long long int) == 2 * sizeof(int)),intwas enough to solve the problem.BTW, if you declared the arrays globally, you would take an MLE verdict.
Sources: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/216259/is-there-a-max-array-length-limit-in-c
Thanks for the help. Btw,Changed the local arrays to global and it worked too. 54515438. Found this article :https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22945647/why-does-a-large-local-array-crash-my-program-but-a-global-one-doesnt
Great :D. I thought that the ML of this problem was 256 MB, now I know it's 512 MB.
Thanks for the link.