№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 156 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
Название |
---|
Try fast cin, cout.
Thank you I got AC using fast i/o. Can you tell me why this (std::ios::sync_with_stdio(false);) speeds up input/output also when should we use fast i/o. ( I mean what is the maximum order of data read or written using cin/cout without fast cin/cout).
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/ios/ios_base/sync_with_stdio/
in MinGW build used by codeforces printf/scanf is much faster than cin/cout even if you'll add sync_with_stdio etc. Tried printing 106 integers in custom test:
cout
— 514 mscout
withsync_with_stdio(false)
— 467 msprintf
— 202 ms