Блог пользователя Najmul_Nahid

Автор Najmul_Nahid, история, 3 часа назад, По-английски

Hello Codeforces,

With plagiarism and throwaway alt accounts remaining an ongoing headache in rated rounds, I've been thinking about the core incentive structure.

Right now, getting banned carries almost zero consequence. Creating a fresh handle takes two minutes and costs nothing, which makes burning disposable accounts effortless for cheaters.

What if creating a new Codeforces account required a tiny, symbolic registration fee (e.g., .50–$1.00)?

Why this could help:

  • Removes the disposable account meta: Alt accounts wouldn't be free anymore.
  • Adds real consequences to bans: Plagiarists would actually face a tangible penalty every time an account gets flagged.
  • Low barrier for honest users: It remains cheap enough that genuine learners aren't heavily burdened, while creating friction for mass account abuse.

Do you think introducing a tiny financial friction would effectively curb throwaway cheating accounts, or would the drawbacks for honest newcomers outweigh the benefits?

What are your thoughts?

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +1
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
3 часа назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Najmul_Nahid (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 часа назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

yeah, your idea to block cheaters is good, but i think the cost can be higher because 0.50-1 usd is just nothing, but it limits the number of account creations by cheaters so codeforces wouldn't be queueforces again, its a good barrier, but certainly, its not enough!

»
3 часа назад, скрыть # |
← Rev. 2  
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Though completely eliminating it isn't possible, but adding a tiny charge might reduce it in a big margin. I am not sure how practical this is, but if it's reasonably feasible, Codeforces should consider it, even if it comes with some drawbacks !!!

»
3 часа назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I like the idea but really I think that itd slow down the growth of honest fresh users massively as well, because if i have my first encounter with competitive programming here and suddenly they want me to pay, i think id just drop the ball on it, at least switch sites yk

»
2 часа назад, скрыть # |
← Rev. 3  
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

i bet majority of <16 cpers wont be able to pay the fee

»
2 часа назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

It’s not worth all this trouble, let whoever cheats cheat, they’re only hurting themselves

Making it about money ruins the whole point, some people just enjoy solving problems and practicing to improve

it’s all just for fun

»
115 минут назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

NAH

»
109 минут назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I don't think so its such a good idea. It doesn't impact the cheaters, since they'll anyway use AI and cheat and still become lets say CM, this small fees(or even large fees) doesn't change the way they do contests.

»
94 минуты назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I like it, also attaches payment info so kind of a hidden KYC.

»
60 минут назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

It's obviously a bad idea. Some students would not be able to afford the fee.