Блог пользователя acat

Автор acat, история, 12 часов назад, По-английски

malikhuhuna5 and bdyby2010010 are cheaters, because their code of prob E https://codeforces.me/contest/2075/submission/311102615 , https://codeforces.me/contest/2075/submission/311093253 is same as https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkDyE8XB-J7QWxnE5zkj_cQ/community?lb=Ugkx6_J_H7Ckk4-TvK89oU-nKG3k8G0phENq

ban them plz

UPD: I have found that there are a large number of players whose E codes are similar to the two codes above, which is probably a large-scale cheating case.

UPD2: Here is a list of some cheaters(rank <= 500): noyon_1985 jayaraj_0304 BarunV_421 bizimlesen Mahdi_13 Half_Gojo bizimlesen aavi2005 BluemoonV acharyatarakanta klu2300030455 bighnesh007 Harshuu_007 kyoshiki amitranjan9708 Rajkumar_24M11MC100 kl2400032885 yangcodeforces ImNotFound F9Devil preethamnimmagadda_0210 VCB nhathuy210 Z.Tianze SharathKumarReddy 2200040322 kushwahaarpit360123 i9u07 CoolAccount imdigitalashish Jayanthdvv PromitSarker Aslaan_Khan relax_tarun nishant_10002 Sunb1m officialaman460 Tide_hunter adw20050204 asjn155 Ar3s 22r01a7359 buvan0702 akashnath420 Dominion948 forsigmayes DaniyalT KL2400031478 Itadori mechanicsstudent m0k3yDlu55y WildPeach.cn Boy.Man KalAwy_ Thunderbolt330 ashudhama18 rohit98 nigga6969 kishorguguloth96 kishorguguloth96 kas9k yashprajapati Papaji_9998 ICantDoIt bs7079961 Fato_Esti_Defectul_Meu Abdullah-Nuces BakhtiyarZBJ daemon90572 Shiplu sakethB11 bjcb kjuby susanzhishen superwomen26 AndrewNguyen MiaoYu404 Ankitmohanty prashant_1609 9ovem aniketcodeforces rahul_a22 The_Bharadwaj Dominatrixx manikantaone aa008 miaplay 5saken pety_body Jasft followtate Asif777 RedefinedRealm rakshit2611 BePhuongSuperSiuwi uk_024 yebaiii pragya_03 balakrishnan sarthak1221

UPD3: After checking the code for question D, I realized that Gmnixr TheTechCoder Thetechieguyy yuangengqi Meghdeip_Biswas pranavmsirur james22 sri156 STXRSHIVA pratapsingh2005 Sahil_112215154 duang___ ramyaullingi Bardho TUSHAR161 is same as https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkDyE8XB-J7QWxnE5zkj_cQ/community?lb=UgkxnUwNaWfdVyQ-Arj-hXWusQ8sohpYL4y4

And flork It seems to have been used Chatgpt to solve prob D.

This is a very terrifying thing because a large number of cheaters even entered the first page!

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +109
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
12 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +11 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
12 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +9 Проголосовать: не нравится

Ban 2 cheaters at least, I want to have 4500 rank in this contest.

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +12 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +12 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +13 Проголосовать: не нравится

I wish that you tube channel also get banned, i have report that video on youtube and i request the same from everyone.

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится
»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

I think uk_024 and yebaiii are cheating too. uk_024's cheating is obvious, he adds template on the top to pretend like normal person, and yebaiii cheats by adding many extra, unnecessary variable names to avoid detection. I discovered this because code B appears to be too similar to that of many cheaters.

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can we just make it so accounts that go from placing < 10k for over 10 contests get instantly flagged if they score < 500th. I can't think of any other reason how they would achieve such a ridiculous performance increase(except if it was like a GM trolling, in which case they would have a couple random high ranking contests, not continuous sub 10k placements)

  • »
    »
    6 часов назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    This is a good idea, although cheaters could (and likely would) make new accounts that would always perform well due to cheating.

  • »
    »
    73 минуты назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    what if someone who's 10kth place takes a break for a year to practice then comes back and gets < 500th on their first contest after they return?

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

https://codeforces.me/profile/pragya_03 check her also her 2 and 4 question solution

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
11 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +16 Проголосовать: не нравится

Total Cheater Death

»
10 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -36 Проголосовать: не нравится

no I do not know any of the other people mentioned here and I wrote the code my self. maybe this is just the way to solve the problem and many people realized this themselves. I dont get why you wrote me in the list

  • »
    »
    4 часа назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

    alr, maybe you had a pure "coincidence" and thought of the exact same solution as the youtube video "coincidentally". however, that doesn't explain your submissions for D, which include useless stuff such as "unsigned long long" and "static". moreover, your code style rapidly changes from using snake case in E to camel case in F. you're fooling no one buddy.

»
10 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -36 Проголосовать: не нравится

What are the similarities between my solution and other users' solutions? Will there be some argumentation of your words and proof that my code refers to someone else's solution? I use an automated code obfuscation module, which is not prohibited by any Codeforces rules. And if you have some guesses, you should substantiate them, not make a list of “cheaters” based solely on their rank...

  • »
    »
    9 часов назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +14 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Go on tell me more shit .

    Spoiler
»
10 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -39 Проголосовать: не нравится

I want to clarify that I am not a cheater. Similarities in code can happen naturally, especially when solving well-known problems with standard approaches. It’s important to remember that having a lower rank doesn’t automatically make someone a cheater—many factors contribute to rank, including experience and the learning process. I’ve always followed the rules and approach challenges honestly. Let’s avoid jumping to conclusions and ensure that accusations are based on solid evidence, rather than assumptions.

»
9 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -22 Проголосовать: не нравится

firstly, i didnt cheat and i can prove it. secondly, i used this time not ideone.com, i used this time for compiler onecompiler.com and i didnt know that its opened for everyone. i really didnt. but i can prove whenever you want. which question you want. if you couldnt solve the problem D and E, it doesnt mean that everyone who solved, cheater. but i know every contest has a cheater, but not only <=500, you should also check >=500, so after that would be fair.

  • »
    »
    5 часов назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Saying that other cheaters exist outside of the top 500 doesn't alleviate any of your guilt

    And there is not enough time to check tens of thousands of submissions from low rated users

»
8 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +14 Проголосовать: не нравится

The only solution to this cheating problem is Phone Verification and IMMEDIATE BAN on the account caught in cheating. or atleast Red mark their profile to indicate as cheater so that it become useless for them otherwise codeforces will lose credibility.

»
7 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +20 Проголосовать: не нравится

This person is the stupidest cheater. He has submissions in java,c++,ruby. Doesnot even bother to remove the comments. And he is a university student. I don't understand how these morons even get an admission.

»
6 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

This guy sarthak1221 solved from A to D in a very small interval of time and also has a very strange solution for D, I've never seen anything like his code.

»
5 часов назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +11 Проголосовать: не нравится

im sorry to say , but there is no point of reporting cheaters, ive done it for the last round and previous rounds , except the author chromate00 , no other author or whoever is incharge took care of removing the cheaters. Especially in the 1007 div2 round and the other recent one. Rollback already happened and everyone turned a blind eye to this.

  • »
    »
    5 часов назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I believe cry and the team was able to remove cheaters from a former contest

»
4 часа назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Cheater demolition. Nice work man.

»
4 часа назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 часа назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by acat (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 часа назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +15 Проголосовать: не нравится

ok i swear im like pretty sure more than half of the ACs on E is cheated

»
57 минут назад, # |
Rev. 3   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Computing bitwidth using temp variable is standard suggestion using github copilot and I would consider boilerplate code. Furthermore, given two long integers, it is norm to compute the max bitwidth. See full video with suggestion here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tTiqiVYTA7U

Furthermore, chatgpt's latest versions (atleast as of o3 mini to date) cannot solve problem E (I have tried this multiple times after the contest). It is possible future versions do. The core idea is to break down the problem into a digit dp version which is non-trivial. Once the digit dp part is identified, the rest is standard.

example suggestion

Update: Seems like o3 mini high could solve after several attempts. However, many of these solutions are still not considered cheating as long as the primary method involves using the variable name temp to compute bit widths.