| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
|
-12
Hello Codeforces, I have received a notification that my submission for problem 2149E (https://codeforces.me/contest/2149/submission/340465979) has been flagged. The question is basically the most commonly found pattern questions based on the sliding window, which can be found on leetcode. So since I am used to this pattern, implementation in the way that I had done, was the most intuitive, and I was used to it. The following are the leetcode questions: https://leetcode.com/problems/subarrays-with-k-different-integers/description/ https://leetcode.com/problems/binary-subarrays-with-sum/description/ https://leetcode.com/problems/count-number-of-nice-subarrays/description/ https://leetcode.com/problems/number-of-subarrays-with-and-value-of-k/description/ and many more Basically, the technique of using sliding window, but for finding at most k, and then at most k-1 and then subtracting to get exactly k. This algorithm is pretty common, so similarity is based upon mere coincidences, and re-evaluation should be done to give a fair judgment. I ensure that I have never copied or used any unfair means to write any code. The similarity is all because of its too basic, standard algorithmic nature. I kindly request you to re-evaluate and give a suitable judgment regarding the same Thanking you, Solandra |
| Name |
|---|


