After taking a peek at the editorial, it looks like pretty much the same thing they are saying so I am not sure what I am missing at the moment.
A quick summary of my current logic as attached above:
Logic
Help on WA for problem Moscow Gorilla
After taking a peek at the editorial, it looks like pretty much the same thing they are saying so I am not sure what I am missing at the moment.
A quick summary of my current logic as attached above:
| Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en3 |
|
SriniV | 2023-06-24 06:51:37 | 26 | Tiny change: 'ary of my current logic as attached above:\n\n<spoi' -> 'ary of my logic:\n\n<spoi' | |
| en2 |
|
SriniV | 2023-06-24 06:51:02 | 63 | Tiny change: 'ubmission:[submissio' -> 'ubmission: [submissio' | |
| en1 |
|
SriniV | 2023-06-24 06:50:24 | 816 | Initial revision (published) |