| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
|
On
maharun →
Reason why upper bound and lower bound flips and erase doesn't work in less_equal PBDS?, 2 years ago
0
handsome solution! now use |
|
0
Allocating an array space and initializing it is always O(n). The correct way to write it should be your global writing method, or. |
|
0
because of the code logic is TLE. Opening an array is generally of a linear complexity rather than O(1). It has nothing to do with being global or not. When n and m are large enough, your tle code is equivalent to doing an additional traversal each time. |
|
On
atcoder_official →
Panasonic Programming Contest 2024(AtCoder Beginner Contest 354) Announcement, 2 years ago
0
why problem use priority_queue wrong? |
| Name |
|---|


